From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8268 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2010 22:00:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 8220 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2010 22:00:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:00:02 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so416144fxm.18 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.27.151 with SMTP id i23mr6987854fac.104.1270591199731; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm2227681fka.43.2010.04.06.14.59.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBBB343.2010206@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:00:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Life On The Helldesk Cygwin-Talk Maiming List Subject: Re: cygintl-8.dll was not found References: <4BB9FCEF.7090404@gmail.com> <4BBA032F.9050006@gmail.com> <4BBA0A82.3040007@gmail.com> <4BBA2AE2.2090000@gmail.com> <4BBA3A46.3030906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On 05/04/2010 22:22, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 5 April 2010 20:30, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 05/04/2010 19:39, wefwef wefwef wrote: >> >>> You also can't see obvious flaws that are right in front of your face, >>> even after they have been pointed out to you several times. >> Sigh, there's that word "obvious" again, as if the way you perceive things >> is absolute and objective and definitively correct and anyone who feels >> differently is just wrong. > > Dave, don't forget about your piano teaching duties. You remember all that plinking and plonking and banging and crashing and woofing? That was *me*, not the dog! He was next door, practicing the Moonlight Sonata at the time. As it happens, my dog has far surpassed my piano-teaching abilities by now; he's off on a world tour as soloist with the Royal Philharmonic Opera next month, and has a series of CD releases coming out this summer. > (Although, going by the username, it can't be entirely ruled out that > you are in fact dealing with a keyboard-wielding member of the Canidae > family here.) Actually, I was fully expecting him to claim that his dog had eaten those log files :-) cheers, DaveK