From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
To: "Isn't this about where we came in?" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Missing link found.
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBE8393.3030106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBE5C6C.8080500@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
On 08/04/2010 23:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 4/8/2010 5:55 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> From the department of we-told-you-so:
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8609192.stm
>>
>> Everyone who didn't believe it existed: Now shut up.
>
> Don't oversell it. It's two fossils, that a substantial fraction of
> scientists (presumably not religiously motivated) believe are actually
> of g. homo, not australopithecine, extraction. The only thing that
> might make them "missing link" material is the reduced cranial capacity
> -- everything else is pure g. homo material. However, Homo floresiensis
> (the "Hobbit") is g. homo, but has even smaller cranial capacity.
>
> So...maybe you're right, but the ground under your feet isn't firm
> enough to start a round of "Shut up, he explained".
Well, indeed, but then again the whole argument is pretty silly in the first
place. No matter how complete the fossil record, someone will always point at
the largest gap between data points and say "Look, a missing link". Now we
have a data point right in the middle of their favourite largest gap. Perhaps
I should have said "Shut up, or choose one of the now-reduced gaps on either
side to focus on next".
cheers,
DaveK
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-08 21:36 Dave Korn
2010-04-08 22:45 ` Charles Wilson
2010-04-09 1:13 ` Dave Korn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBE8393.3030106@gmail.com \
--to=dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com \
--cc=cygwin-talk@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).