From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2010 01:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 3018 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2010 01:45:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:45:30 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so6394042wyb.2 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.155.3 with SMTP id q3mr2836300wbw.130.1282441528496; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm3984706wbb.8.2010.08.21.18.45.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C708658.5080300@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:45:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ok thunderbird thats the third time you just magically deleted this header and now i am getting bored with retyping it Subject: Re: Bug tracker References: <4C6D17E0.5010506@blunn.org> <8cdq66dd6mang9d5oseab1v7l20io5epmi@4ax.com> <20100819141948.GB19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100819144931.GD19001@calimero.vinschen.de> <4C6D559B.4030108@bopp.net> <20100819173439.GC9090@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4C6D8D33.5070902@bopp.net> <4C6D8FD7.4090506@redhat.com> <20100819202648.GC9840@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20100819202648.GC9840@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On 19/08/2010 21:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 08/19/2010 01:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: >>> Of course the quality of the defect tracker is directly related to the >>> effort the maintainers put in to keep it relatively pruned and >>> organized. Maybe that is too much to expect for most maintainers at >>> this time. >> Bingo. That's why I'm perfectly happy with mailing lists and no extra >> burden of a web-based tracker for the packages I maintain on my spare >> time. Why add overhead to a process that already works for me? > > Feelthy steenking luddite. You're admitting that you're satisfied with > mediocrity! You probably torture small animals too, just like Dave. > > cgf But I both torture small animals and like bug trackers! And I don't even care if that is a double-standard! cheers, DaveK