From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25583 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2010 17:51:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 25494 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2010 17:51:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from simon.codemeta.com (HELO simon.codemeta.com) (199.125.75.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:50:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-31-207-108.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [66.31.207.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simon.codemeta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED965708D5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:50:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D07AE6C.4080700@veritech.com> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:51:00 -0000 From: "Lee D. Rothstein" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cygwin, Talk Amongst Yourselves" Subject: Re: Executable named "[.exe" in c:\cygwin\bin? References: <4D04C14E.90607@gmx.de> <4D04C262.50507@gmail.com> <4D04D130.9090006@gmx.de> <20101212195154.GG14369@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20101212195154.GG14369@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On 12/12/2010 2:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Maybe in 1986 there was a shell which didn't do this properly under > Ultrix. No winky? Come on, man! ;-) Ah yes, DEC and UNIX, a match made in one of them thar' h-things ... > I sincerely doubt that any modern shell has a problem.