From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20545 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2012 05:47:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 20530 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2012 05:47:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_RX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:47:25 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so8207717obq.2 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.188.233 with SMTP id gd9mr11787483igc.73.1342936044513; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.200.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nh1sm3003545igc.11.2012.07.21.22.47.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <500B93EA.7050002@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:47:00 -0000 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade References: <5008629D.5090308@redhat.com> <50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com> <500878BF.8070507@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 2012-07-19 16:45, K Stahl wrote: > Just attempted to compile the latest (rxvt-unicode-9.15) and ran into > issues. As I'm not completely versed in setting up the configuration > environment in Cygwin, I'm at a loss. Seeing as there were numerous > packages that were updated as a result of the Perl version increment, > reverting to an older version is less than an ideal solution at this > point. > > Could someone contact Yaakov and get his input on the situation? ^^^^^^ Anyone else notice how I get blamed for everything around here? :-) Yaakov