From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3228 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2010 11:20:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 3220 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2010 11:20:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:19:59 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMIou-0006jj-7m for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:19:56 +0100 Received: from 80-219-87-195.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.219.87.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:19:56 +0100 Received: from cygwin by 80-219-87-195.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:19:56 +0100 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com From: Gary Subject: Re: Cygwin mentioned in "current directory" discussion Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <83wrnzt3n4.fsf@garydjones.name> References: <20101110043738.GA19327@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20101115192609.GA22462@calimero.vinschen.de> <20101116082924.GA26851@calimero.vinschen.de> <20101116161100.GE4671@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20101116195202.GA1648@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (cygwin) X-No-Archive: Yes X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Nice guy. He actually makes cgf look pleasant, well mannered, and inoffensive. > I guess that's not allowed > to say, either... I guess we're both going to get our wrists slapped :D -- Gary Non-kook (allegedly)