From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-5141-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 20580 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2011 16:32:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 20559 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2011 16:32:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:32:27 +0000
Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so7542832qwf.2        for <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.208.68 with SMTP id gb4mr1692903qab.8.1300897946459; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.47.65 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110323161942.GF13862@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <20086.1300839850@freon.franz.com>	<20110323053241.GB13862@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<AANLkTik4N-OP96S_ZAS0cSm9jtmQyOsVGZjeHhjEut=D@mail.gmail.com>	<20110323144639.GD13862@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>	<4D8A1097.8060001@cwilson.fastmail.fm>	<20110323161942.GF13862@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTiksWiXGniGjub9qwQyzQuFCkPQmF7VsTw9vB92A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.8 + 3/18/11 snapshot + git = crash
From: David Sastre <d.sastre.medina@gmail.com>
To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin-talk.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2

2011/3/23, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:24:07AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Even with marco's smiley, I suspect legitimate confusion, not snark.
>
> Actually, it was confirmed that it actually was "snark" (man, I hate
> that word) in cygwin-talk.  And, that's where further discussion should
> take place.

My only reference for that word comes from Lewis Carrol's "The Hunting
Of The Snark".
Seems unrelated, though...