From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6013 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2005 18:37:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Received: (qmail 5956 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2005 18:37:36 -0000 Received: from slinky.cs.nyu.edu (HELO slinky.cs.nyu.edu) (128.122.20.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:37:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slinky.cs.nyu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j57IbYW3010649 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:38:00 -0000 From: One Angry User X-X-Sender: pechtcha@slinky.cs.nyu.edu Reply-To: Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Subject: RE: OoC Ironic assessment (was Serious performance problems (malloc related?)) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dave Korn's computer deigned to emit the following stream of bytes: > ----Original Message---- > >From: Linda W > >Sent: 04 June 2005 23:23 > > > OoC! OoC!!! (Out of Context) and poppycock! I didn't speculate on the > > problem, I speculated what made Window's 'File-Open's so slow. > > This is a known problem. It wasn't speculation about what cygwin was > > doing. ;-/ > > > > Unless, you are asserting that I haven't instrumented WinXP > > to find it's performance bottlenecks, but that would hardly be > > necessary to comment on performance issues concerning POSIX emulation > > vs. native performance. > > > > Wind me up, you are trying, me thinks. *Plblblb* > > > > -l > > goshdarn my secret is out! Cue the chickens... OAU