From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32162 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2005 23:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Received: (qmail 32087 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2005 23:00:32 -0000 Received: from slinky.cs.nyu.edu (HELO slinky.cs.nyu.edu) (128.122.20.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:00:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slinky.cs.nyu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5GN0UW3012353 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:00:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:23:00 -0000 From: One Angry User X-X-Sender: pechtcha@slinky.cs.nyu.edu Reply-To: Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List Subject: Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin? In-Reply-To: <20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Message-ID: References: <508734440@web.de> <20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor's computer deigned to emit the following stream of bytes: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote: > >cygwin@cygwin.com schrieb am 16.06.05 17:03:10: > > Actually, that was cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com who schrieb: Hehe... > >>>site:cygwin.com inurl:cygwin inurl:ml > >>> > >>>You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those > >>>are part of the URL. In addition, the list is archived at many other > >>>places, all of which have searches. Three that come to mind are > >>>gmane.org, marc.theaimsgroup.com, and mail-archive.com. > >> > >>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this. I think a few more > >>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean > >>response from me. > > > >Pity it didn't come. I would have been able to answer accordingly, > >mind you. I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if > >someone reports a problem. But if you want war, you get war if need > >be. > > Can't talk now. I'm digging trenches. Those won't save you from falling hippos. :-p OAU