From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16800 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2006 22:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 16792 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2006 22:57:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ACCESS1.CIMS.NYU.EDU (HELO access1.cims.nyu.edu) (128.122.81.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:57:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by access1.cims.nyu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5TMv2ND003005 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:57:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:57:00 -0000 From: Igor Peshansky Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List Subject: Re: Help Understanding Path Issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <006a01c69b13$658a1570$3201a8c0@Purcell9100> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00467.txt.bz2 On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, mwoehlke wrote: > While CC'ing me for some reason(?), Igor Peshansky wrote: > (And was there a reason for that, or did you just hit 'reply all' by > accident/reflex/because the hippo made me?) I always hit "Reply-All", and you didn't have Reply-To: set. > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, mwoehlke wrote: > > > Scott Purcell wrote: > > > > I have "CLASSPATHS" and "PATHS" and some "HOME" directories set up. > > > > Eg: ANT_HOME value=C:/ant/bin > > > I assume you meant "CLASSPATH" and "PATH". > > > > I think he meant "CLASSPATH"s and "PATH"s. :-) > > Um... actually, I was assuming he only had one $PATH. If he has more, > how does bash tell them apart? ;-) Well, okay, "*CLASSPATH"s and "*PATH"s... > > Actually, the list of variables automatically translated by Cygwin was > > posted here at some point (it may even be in the FAQ). At the very > > least it's PATH, HOME, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but there may be others. > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Since when does Windows have any clue what to do with > *that*? (Or it it folded into PATH?) Hmm... [Digs into the sources]... Yep, here's the full list as of today: PATH, HOME, LD_LIBRARY_PATH (yes!), TMPDIR, TMP, TEMP. And no, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not folded into PATH. And don't ask me why it gets converted... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte." "But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"