From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-1142-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 21023 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2005 09:23:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 21007 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2005 09:23:01 -0000
Received: from host217-40-213-68.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:23:01 +0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:22:58 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'recursion \(n\): see recursion \(q.v.\)'" <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
Subject: FW: missing entry inet_ntop cygwin1.dll (was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated:  OpenSSH-4.1p1-2)
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:23:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <SERRANOjdxyscXIW6Jm0000040c@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2

----Original Message----
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 06 July 2005 20:55

> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:19:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> I've just updated the version of OpenSSH to 4.1p1-2.
>>> 
>>> This version is equivalent to 4.1p1-1, except it's now linked against
>>> the new OpenSSL 0.9.8.
>> 
>> It is missing inet_ntop in my cygwin1.dll...
>> 
>> I must upgrade Cygwin to 1.5.18 before using it?
> 
> Is this a rhetorical question?
> 
> cgf


  Is this "Is this a rhetorical question?" a rhetorical question?

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....