From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24911 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2005 15:48:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List Received: (qmail 24856 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2005 15:47:59 -0000 Received: from host217-40-213-68.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:47:59 +0000 Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:47:40 +0100 From: "Dave Korn" To: "'don't you start'" Subject: RE: FW: missing entry inet_ntop cygwin1.dll (was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: OpenSSH-4.1p1-2) Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:48:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050707154205.GD9157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 ----Original Message---- >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 07 July 2005 16:42 > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:22:43AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> ----Original Message---- >>> From: Christopher Faylor >>> Sent: 06 July 2005 20:55 >>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:19:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>> I've just updated the version of OpenSSH to 4.1p1-2. >>>>> >>>>> This version is equivalent to 4.1p1-1, except it's now linked against >>>>> the new OpenSSL 0.9.8. >>>> >>>> It is missing inet_ntop in my cygwin1.dll... >>>> >>>> I must upgrade Cygwin to 1.5.18 before using it? >>> >>> Is this a rhetorical question? >> >> Is this "Is this a rhetorical question?" a rhetorical question? > > Not always. > > cgf Is this "Not always" not always "Not always"? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....