From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31353 invoked by alias); 25 May 2006 20:06:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 31341 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2006 20:06:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 May 2006 20:06:19 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FjM5x-0002ot-6I for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:06:09 +0200 Received: from 65.207.213.226 ([65.207.213.226]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:06:09 +0200 Received: from mwoehlke by 65.207.213.226 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:06:09 +0200 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: slow share = slow scripts? Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <004b01c68020$2ca7a190$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20060525175702.GO13907@ns1.anodized.com> <20060525181108.GF5946@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote: >> According to the man page, 'mount -f' does X. From *real experience* I >> *know* that it, in fact, does Y. I think we have agreed that this is >> MSFTEU = confusing. Let's not argue about it. > > Again, CYNUX. Whatever you learned about mount in Linux will not apply to > Cygwin. You've made the mistake of assuming that it does. An > understandable mistake, but still not MSFTEU. What does "'-f' also means '-no-no-executable'" have to do with Linux? Anyway, *I* thought that "this flag that we tell you does X in fact /also/ does Y" was an appropriate use of the acronym. If it isn't, then I guess I don't know what is. > FWIW, running "mount -rtfm" produces extremely helpful output. :-D Heh... one character different from 'mount -wtf'? ;-) -- Matthew ...Ruthlessly beating Windows with a hammer until it looks like POSIX.