From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-talk-return-2416-listarch-cygwin-talk=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 1386 invoked by alias); 26 May 2006 18:38:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 1370 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2006 18:38:48 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 May 2006 18:38:46 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) 	id 1FjhCi-0002Js-CV 	for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Fri, 26 May 2006 20:38:32 +0200
Received: from 65.207.213.226 ([65.207.213.226])         by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>; Fri, 26 May 2006 20:38:32 +0200
Received: from mwoehlke by 65.207.213.226 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>; Fri, 26 May 2006 20:38:32 +0200
To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
From:  mwoehlke <mwoehlke@tibco.com>
Subject:  Re: No postnews or other Usenet news utilities?
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <e57hur$f78$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <e54hu0$ghc$1@sea.gmane.org> <001b01c6806c$ff6796c0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>  <e5759h$u7l$1@sea.gmane.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0605261216130.19906@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0605261216130.19906@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-talk-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com>, <http://cygwin.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com
Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk@cygwin.com>
X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2

Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
>> [snip] { a => b, b => c } <=> { a => c }
> 
> The implication doesn't go both ways -- only to the right.

Oh, duh, you're right of course. :-)

Sheesh, and I *majored* in this stuff...

>> Feed the hippo.
> 
> People, we've got a convert!

You *just* noticed? ;-)

>> Love the hippo.
> 
> But this is not THAT kind of list.

Hey, I "love" my cats (um... no you're not one of "my cats" :-)), but 
not *that* way! You're thinking the wrong kind of "love"!

>> Run from the hippo.
> 
> Naturally...

:-D

-- 
Matthew
Feed the hippo. Love the hippo. Run from the hippo.