From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23741 invoked by alias); 31 May 2006 19:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 23722 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2006 19:44:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 19:44:29 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FlWbm-00049C-TJ for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:43:59 +0200 Received: from 65.207.213.226 ([65.207.213.226]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:43:58 +0200 Received: from mwoehlke by 65.207.213.226 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:43:58 +0200 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: 1.5.19-4 & snapshot-20060529 : crash when freeing null std::string in dll (resend for attachment renaming) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <447DE070.6070609@gmail.com> <03e901c684e0$fbf906e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) In-Reply-To: <03e901c684e0$fbf906e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > On 31 May 2006 19:29, LenX wrote: >> (resend for attachment renaming) > > That was completely stupid and pointless. You spammed the list with 500k of > duplicate rubbish just because you wanted to change the names? That's really > SOOOOooo worth it for everyone else. NOT! FCOL, why didn't you just send a > short email listing the new names? In all fairness, he probably did that because he received a bounce notification, just like I did when I posted a .bz2... not from the list, but from the over-zealous AV filter of someone *subscribed to* the list (say, I thought such bounces were supposed to go to the list admin, not the list poster?). ...Meaning he failed to pay attention to where the e-mail came from and did, as you noted, spam the list with another half MB of attachment. The correct response would have been to a: ignore it (what I did), or b: send a follow-up suggesting that anyone that didn't get the attachment find it via the archives. -- Matthew Doom doom dooM doo-DooM dOOm DOom doOM... DOOM! -- Gir