From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26791 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2006 21:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 26784 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2006 21:32:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:32:23 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FwQb4-0007M2-Dg for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:32:18 +0200 Received: from 65.207.213.226 ([65.207.213.226]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:32:18 +0200 Received: from mwoehlke by 65.207.213.226 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:32:18 +0200 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: Help Understanding Path Issue Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <006a01c69b13$658a1570$3201a8c0@Purcell9100> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, mwoehlke wrote: >> Igor Peshansky wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, mwoehlke wrote: >>>> Igor Peshansky wrote: >>>>> Actually, the list of variables automatically translated by Cygwin was >>>>> posted here at some point (it may even be in the FAQ). At the very >>>>> least it's PATH, HOME, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but there may be others. >>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Since when does Windows have any clue what to do with >>>> *that*? (Or it it folded into PATH?) >>> Hmm... [Digs into the sources]... Yep, here's the full list as of today: >>> PATH, HOME, LD_LIBRARY_PATH (yes!), TMPDIR, TMP, TEMP. And no, >>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not folded into PATH. And don't ask me why it gets >>> converted... >> Ok, I won't... but at least my confusion is shared. I feel better now. :-) > > As Corinna said, the ChangeLogs speak for themselves. See the entry for > 2005-05-21 in src/winsup/cygwin. > Igor hmm... get_full_path_of_dll()... that being a Cygwin function (unless Google has lost it), why would this ever need to be in non-POSIX format? ...Still confused. :-) -- Matthew Do not expose to hippos. Doing so may void your warranty.