From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19958 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2008 23:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 19951 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2008 23:45:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:45:05 +0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KY8De-0006K8-DB for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:45:02 +0000 Received: from 65.207.248.83 ([65.207.248.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:45:02 +0000 Received: from mw_triad by 65.207.248.83 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:45:02 +0000 To: cygwin-talk@cygwin.com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: Cygwin Secure Shell Version 1.5.25-15 Request for U.S. Export Information 19399845 08222008 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <48AECD50.15EC2303@dessent.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080723 Fedora/2.0.0.16-1.fc9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: <48AECD50.15EC2303@dessent.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-talk-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-talk-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 Brian Dessent wrote: > "TSG Software Licensing (GE Infra, Aviation)" wrote: > >> GE Aviation is in the process of reviewing your software product, >> Secure Shell Version 1.5.25-15 > > Cygwin drinking game participants, meet The Widowmaker(tm). [snip] Hmm, I didn't realize it was *that* bad. Don't suppose anyone's compiled the list of which rules they tripped? (Solely for my convenience determining just how much I "need" to imbibe, of course :-). Er... especially since it doesn't match *any* of the rules I have, that I can see. Maybe we need to add some?) -- Matthew Person A: It's an ISO standard. Person B: ...And that means what? --mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)