From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30503 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2004 20:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 30496 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2004 20:41:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO steelemr-loadb-nat-49.caltech.edu) (131.215.49.69) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2004 20:41:15 -0000 Received: from fire-dog (fire-dog [192.168.1.4]) by earth-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F02109A34; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth-ox ([192.168.1.9]) by fire-dog (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.150] (charter-241-136.caltech.edu [131.215.241.136]) by earth-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C224A109A34; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3FF501A6.40101@msu.edu> References: <3FF501A6.40101@msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <009EE30A-3D64-11D8-B615-000A95A518CC@caltech.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cygx From: Nathan Gray Subject: Re: Cygwin/X NEdit package maintainership Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:41:00 -0000 To: discuss@nedit.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 List-Id: On Jan 1, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Harold L Hunt II wrote: > It might be wise if someone from the NEdit project would review the > Cygwin/X NEdit package. The goal would be to determine if the > Cygwin/X NEdit package has any common or easily detectable > platform-dependent bugs. > I don't use windows/cygwin so I can't really comment on platform-dependent bugs, but I can comment on platform *independent* bugs, namely building with the wrong version of Lesstif/Open Motif. As long as you aren't bypassing any warnings when building NEdit 5.4 (e.g. defining BUILD_BROKEN_NEDIT) things should be fine on this account. Cheers, -n8 P.S. Props to you for keeping your cool when dealing with the XFree86 project. Very professional. Too bad the same can't be said for them. -- >>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------> >>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->