Re: xorg-server-1.9.2-1 Fullscreen Issue

[rp@win.tue.nl (Reinier Post)]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:48:44PM +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 21/01/2011 04:38, Frederick D. Hansen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:37 +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >> On 18/11/2010 12:33, Frederick Hansen wrote:
> >>> Just FYI, after upgrading to xorg-server 1.9.2, any attempt to run in fullscreen results in an error.  Downgrading to version 1.8.2 seems to correct the issue.  Running either version in multiwindow also works.
> >>>
> >>> The contents of Xwin.log are shown below:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Welcome to the XWin X Server
> >>> Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project
> >>> Release: 1.9.2.0 (10902000)
> >>> Build Date: 2010-11-03
> >>>
> >>> XWin was started with the following command line:
> >>>
> >>> /usr/bin/XWin -fullscreen -depth 8 -clipboard -silent-dup-error 

By the way, on my machine, this is just:

X :0 -multiwindow 

> >> [snip]
> >>> [ 30091.406] (EE) XKB: Could not invoke xkbcomp
> >>> [ 30091.406] (EE) XKB: Couldn't compile keymap
> >>> [ 30091.406] XKB: Failed to compile keymap
> >>> [ 30091.406] Keyboard initialization failed. This could be a missing or incorrect setup of xkeyboard-config.
> >>> [ 30091.406] 
> >>> Fatal server error:
> >>> [ 30091.406] Failed to activate core devices.

This was the same for me.

> >> Are you sure that removing -fullscreen allows the X server to start properly?

I didn't have it in the first place.

> I use XP SP3.  I can't reproduce this problem.
> 
> The problem going away when you remove (and hence prevent from loading) the
> dynamically loaded swrast_dri.so *really* makes this look like a remap problem.

I'm on Windows 7.
Renaming /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so fixed the problem for me.

I then renamed it back and ran rebase on it
with the defaults used in rebaseall.  X is still starting up.

I then created rebase.lst using the commands used in rebaseall.
/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so is in there.

But I have run rebaseall immediately prior to starting X
and it was still failing to start.

So it does appear to be a rebase problem,
and I have no clue why rebaseall couldn't fix it.
(It was completing successfully.)

> There is some work upstream to remove this rather pointless fork/exec of
> xkbcomp and replace it with libxkbcommon, but that now seems unlikely to
> appear in X server 1.10.

> -- 
> Jon TURNEY
> Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer

-- 
Reinier Post

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/