On Aug 14 08:28, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 14/08/2013 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Aug 14 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>On Aug 14 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>On Aug 14 06:28, Ken Brown wrote: > >>>>On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>>>On Aug 14 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>>>>On Aug 13 18:00, Ken Brown wrote: > >>>>>>>On 8/13/2013 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>>>>>>What function is not implemented? Is that something we can fix, > >>>>>>>>perhaps in the Cygwin DLL? > >>>>>>>It's memalign, or at least that's what it was in 2007. See > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-02/msg00678.html > >>>>>>So it's using its own malloc but we don't support overriding other > >>>>>>functions besides malloc/realloc/calloc/free. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>In theory we could do that in future. We still have room for 10 (x86) > >>>>>>resp. 12 (x86_64) pointers in the per_process structure, which could be > >>>>>>used for this purpose. This would only require applications which need > >>>>>>this feature to be rebuilt with the next Cygwin version providing these > >>>>>>pointers. > >>>>>More precisely, they have to be rebuild using crt0.o from the next > >>>>>Cygwin release, and they would have to run under the next Cygwin > >>>>>release. If you omit one step, you're back to the current behaviour. > >>>>> > >>>>>>But we shouldn't waste those unused slots either, so the number of > >>>>>>overridable functions should be kept small. In theory we have mallopt, > >>>>>>mallinfo, posix_memalign, memalign, and valloc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I guess we can skip mallopt and mallinfo since they are pretty > >>>>>>seldomly used in user-provided malloc implementations. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Memalign is an old, deprecated function, so I wonder why it's used at > >>>>>>all. GSlice should use posix_memalign instead. Yaakov, is there an > >>>>>>option to use posix_memalign rather than memalign? > >>>>I just checked the glib source, and it does use posix_memalign if > >>>>it's available. I was quoting a 2007 discussion when I said it was > >>>>memalign that GSlice wanted to use. > >>>Given that, we should perhaps skip the memalign override. > >>On second (third? fourth?) thought, I think we should do this with > >>posix_memalign only. valloc is just as obsolete as posix_memalign. > >I applied the patch to allow overriding posix_memalloc only, and I'm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >building snapshots right now. For testing, this requires to rebuild > >either emacs, or glib, or both, I'm not sure. Make sure to link against > >the new crt0.o/libcygwin.a and use the new Cygwin DLL for testing. > Wait, it's "memalign" that's obsolete and "posix_memalign" that you > added a patch for, right? The last couple of paragraphs were a > little confusing... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat