From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21423 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2003 08:57:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 21415 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 08:57:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nbizdmz101.vandemoortele.com) (212.190.80.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 08:57:20 -0000 Received: from nbiz202.vandemoortele.com (unverified) by nbizdmz101.vandemoortele.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:56:54 +0100 Received: by NBIZ202 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:57:09 +0100 Message-ID: <2FAEFC2A851BD211AD820008C7286BA403F99969@NBIZ205> From: "Pille Geert (bizvdm)" To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: RE: [Xoncygwin-cvs] CVS Update: cygwin-xfree-doc (branch: trunk) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:57:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 List-Id: I know, I should read the full digest before reacting. Mea culpa, Geert On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Pille Geert (bizvdm) wrote: > Hallo, > > Will the "rootless" option be removed? Or do I get this ("everything that > smelled like rootless") wrong? There is new code for rootless so I've tried not to copy the old code. bye ago =============================== This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. You are explicitly requested to notify the sender of this email that the intended recipient was not reached.