From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7938 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 19:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 7929 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 19:00:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO central.ixn.com) (65.19.132.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 19:00:10 -0000 Received: from msu.edu (office.ixn.com [68.23.74.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by central.ixn.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB4J04DN023144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:00:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FCF8430.3020701@msu.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:00:00 -0000 From: Harold L Hunt II User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaud Desitter CC: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: Re: DDD 3.3.8 (i686-pc-cygwin) gets `Segmentation fault WAS Re: c ompiling DDD References: <3FCF578A.9030304@msu.edu> <0ad701c3ba8c$e47ad9b0$d92601a3@ouce.ox.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <0ad701c3ba8c$e47ad9b0$d92601a3@ouce.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 List-Id: Arnaud Desitter wrote: >>>If yes, these rules have been changing. Brian, isn't this what you >>>were specifically working on recently? >> >>The statement in quotes above is now misleading and completely >>incorrect. We are distributing *only* a shared version of LessTif on >>Cygwin now. The various problems mentioned in the quote all have >>work-arounds, some of which were already used by OS/2; we enabled those >>work-arounds and adding one or two more of our own and the shared >>LessTif library compiles and works fine now. >> > > > Fill free to contact the lesstif guys to fix it. > > Regards, Regards, My bad... I'm just a clueless newbie to this whole open-source development thingy majig. Harold