From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-xfree-return-18957-listarch-cygwin-xfree=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 21508 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 02:44:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-xfree-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 21500 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 02:44:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sys15.mail.msu.edu) (35.9.75.115)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 02:44:37 -0000
Received: from [207.179.68.222] (helo=msu.edu)
	by sys15.mail.msu.edu with asmtp (Exim 4.24 #37)
	(TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1B0ti1-000606-De
	for cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:44:37 -0500
Message-ID: <404E8115.2010200@msu.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:44:00 -0000
From: Harold L Hunt II <huntharo@msu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: X/Cygwin icon proposal
References: <IMEDKPLHDOLIKADDEMBGCEDBCEAA.bax3.NO@SPAM.bigfoot.com> <c2l08r$s95$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <c2l08r$s95$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus: None found by Clam AV
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00247.txt.bz2
List-Id: <cygwin-xfree.sourceware.org>

Nahor,

Hmm... that is an interesting change.  I am now split 33-33-33 between 
the current, the one in CVS, and the one you just sent :)

I really don't know which I prefer.

Harold

Nahor wrote:

> Michael Bax wrote:
> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> 
> Let me play medium...I seeee....yessss... you don't have a black 
> desktop! :)
> The icon is completely invisible on black background.
> 
> And the logo is not smooth, i.e. the line are not of homogeneous thickness.
> I suggest that, instead of removing the white specks (which are actually 
> shades of gray to smooth the black lines), you actually make a real 
> white line around the black area.
> 
> All in all, I prefer the current icon. And that has nothing to do with 
> the fact that I made it. No, definitely not! ;)
> 
> Anyway, attached is one with a real white line around it. Some may like 
> it better. I'm 50-50 between the current one and the one attached.
> 
>     Nahor