public inbox for cygwin-xfree@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon TURNEY <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: /dev/windows and select() [was Re: Slow response to keypresses in xorg-server-1.8.0-1]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7B9E4B.2060800@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100830112313.GN6726@calimero.vinschen.de>
On 30/08/2010 12:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 29 14:39, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 12:04, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> On 7 August 2010 23:07, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>>> Hmmm, looking again at the implementation of select(), I don't immediately
>>>> see that when waiting on /dev/windows, it checks that the message queue has
>>>> old messages on it before waiting. The MSDN documentation for
>>>> MsgWaitForMultipleObjects() seems to says that messages which had arrived
>>>> before the last PeekMessage() etc. aren't considered new and so don't end
>>>> the wait?
>>>
>>> I think you're right, a call to PeekMessage is needed for proper
>>> select() semantics: it shouldn't block if data is available for
>>> reading.
>>
>> Attached is a small test-case which seems to demonstrate this problem.
>>
>> Run ./dev-windows-select-test and observe select() blocks for the
>> full timeout, despite the fact that the /dev/windows fd is ready for
>> reading (and it reported as such as the end of the timeout)
>>
>> If you run './dev-windows-select-test -skip' to skip the
>> PeekMessage(), select() returns immediately, indicating the
>> /dev/windows fd is ready for reading.
>
> Again, thanks for the testcase. I applied a patch to Cygwin which
> should make select on /dev/windows fully functional.
>
> The blessed solution is to replace the call to MsgWaitForMultipleObjects
> with a call to MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx with the MWMO_INPUTAVAILABLE
> flag set. This flag is defined to do exactly what we need.
>
> The only downside is that this flag does not exist on NT4 and its usage
> results in an "invalid argument" error. So, for NT4, I added the
> workaround I described in my yesterday's soliloquy.
>
> I'm planning to release Cygwin 1.7.7 tomorrow at the latest, so please
> give it a test as soon as possible. Here's a binary DLL for testing
> (build w/o optimization, so it's probably a bit slow):
>
> http://cygwin.de/cygwin-177/new-cygwin1.dll.bz2
> (md5sum: 7e07fd9eafd021697a0861c1ae4fa94e)
Thanks Corinna :-)
I tried that cygwin DLL with my test case, and with an X server with what I
now realize is the workaround I'd applied reverted [1] and it seems to work fine.
[1]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~yselkowitz/xserver/commit/?h=cygwin-release-1.8&id=6da3190eacae2c2b021060f8fd9427816ac06f21
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-30 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-01 13:49 Slow response to keypresses in xorg-server-1.8.0-1 Ken Brown
2010-05-02 20:52 ` Ken Brown
2010-05-18 18:52 ` Ryan Johnson
2010-06-30 17:40 ` Jon TURNEY
2010-07-01 2:02 ` Ken Brown
2010-07-01 21:07 ` Marco Atzeri
2010-07-19 14:11 ` Simon Marlow
2010-08-03 16:43 ` Ryan Johnson
2010-08-05 18:53 ` Laurent Montaron
2010-08-07 15:39 ` Reini Urban
2010-08-07 22:07 ` Jon TURNEY
2010-08-08 11:05 ` Andy Koppe
2010-08-29 14:17 ` /dev/windows and select() [was Re: Slow response to keypresses in xorg-server-1.8.0-1] Jon TURNEY
2010-08-29 14:41 ` Corinna Vinschen
2010-08-29 14:50 ` Corinna Vinschen
2010-08-29 15:09 ` Corinna Vinschen
2010-08-30 11:23 ` Trollope, David
2010-08-30 12:05 ` Corinna Vinschen
2010-08-30 12:33 ` Jon TURNEY [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C7B9E4B.2060800@dronecode.org.uk \
--to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
--cc=cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).