Re: Still can't run XServer or any apps that require it

[Jon TURNEY <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>]

On 26/04/2011 16:37, Larry Hall (Cygwin-X) wrote:
> On 4/26/2011 1:16 AM, David M. Karr wrote:
>> On 4/25/2011 10:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>>> On 23/04/2011 17:47, David M. Karr wrote:
>>>>> Almost a week ago now, I've been unable to run my XServer, and thus any
>>>>> of the
>>>>> apps that normally run with it, like Emacs.
>>>> I realise this situation is an inconvenience, but please don't post to
>>>> multiple lists just because you don't get a quick response.
>>>>
>>>>> When I run "startxwin", it just
>>>>> says "failed to activate core devices".
>>>> [snip]
>>>>> [498341.949] (EE) XKB: Could not invoke xkbcomp
>>>>> [498341.949] (EE) XKB: Couldn't compile keymap
>>>>> [498341.949] (EE) XKB: Failed to load keymap. Loading default keymap
>>>>> instead.
>>>>> [498342.089] (EE) XKB: Could not invoke xkbcomp
>>>>> [498342.089] (EE) XKB: Couldn't compile keymap
>>>>> [498342.089] XKB: Failed to compile keymap
>>>>> [498342.089] Keyboard initialization failed. This could be a missing or
>>>>> incorrect setup of xkeyboard-config.
>>>>> [498342.089] Fatal server error: Failed to activate core devices.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> I looked in the FAQ for the entry corresponding to this error, but none
>>>>> of the
>>>>> steps found any issues. I've tried doing "rebaseall" according to the
>>>>> instructions, but that hasn't made any difference. In fact, my problems
>>>>> started when I ran "rebaseall" to fix a different problem. I was getting
>>>>> "Doing vfork: resource temporarily unavailable" when I started up Emacs, and
>>>>> some advice I found suggested running "rebaseall".
>>>> Unfortunately, rebaseall is a rather limited workaround, rather than a
>>>> solution for these issues (for reasons which have been discussed extensively
>>>> in the past)
>>>>
>>>> There has been a recent cygwin DLL change which *might* help in this
>>>> situation, so I'd suggest you try the 2011-04-07 snapshot from [1] and see if
>>>> that makes a difference. (I wouldn't recommend later ones as they seem to
>>>> have
>>>> a regression in a different area)

Looking into this a bit more, it's not quite clear what's going on here:

There's a few failure modes which can be reported as "XKB: Could not invoke
xkbcomp", but the assumption that this is a fork() failure seems likely, given
that the problem can be made to go away by rebasing.

But I think that, at the point which fork() is invoked, XWin hasn't loaded any
DLLs yet, so the fork() failure shouldn't be due to an inability to remap DLLs
in the child to the same address as the parent.

>>>> [1] http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>> Also, I've found that using a different base address with rebaseall
>>> seems to help with some X problems:
>>>
>>> dash -c "rebaseall -b 0x77000000"
>>>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-04/msg00306.html
>>>
>>
>> Ok, that appears to have fixed my problem. Is that a "permanent" fix?
> 
> For now, yes. ;-)

Humour-impaired persons, please note smiley

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/