From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31512 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2014 19:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 31494 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2014 19:55:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.227) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:55:14 +0000 Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GCju1o00327AodY5CKvCXa; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:55:12 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([98.209.153.10]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GKvC1o00X0DjPYq3fKvCXa; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:55:12 +0000 Message-ID: <53A34072.7060607@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:55:00 -0000 From: Patrick Herbst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: Re: XRaiseWindow for activating windows in multiwindow mode In-Reply-To: 53A2B675.3020704@gmx.de References: CACMdL5LcppcQ0AS6xmfqgzsnU6Qr8UB0Mc5YwZYjBBrTbUpzPQ@mail.gmail.com, 53A2B675.3020704@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 > I used my patch from 2011 every day for the last three years and it > worked always without any problems. I was also able to incorporate this > patch into the newest cygwin x server running under 64-bit cygwin > without any problems. > > See also: > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2011-08/msg00034.html > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2011-09/msg00000.html > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2011-09/msg00003.html > > I don't understand, why this patch was not included into the official > cygwin-x-server. Of course it would be nice, if a better solution was > available. For pragmatic reasons it would be nice to include this patch > into official cygwin x server until a better solution is available. How can we get this rolled into the release? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/