From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18914 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2015 09:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 18898 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2015 09:12:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: selene.blankersfamily.com Received: from 87-161.ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl (HELO selene.blankersfamily.com) (88.159.161.87) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 09:12:49 +0000 Received: from gaia.blankersfamily.com (gaia.blankersfamily.com [172.30.0.103]) by selene.blankersfamily.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08831BF for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:12:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (Authenticated sender: laurens@blankersfamily.com) by gaia.blankersfamily.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 111E2B8 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:12:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54ABA706.8030104@blankersfamily.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 09:12:00 -0000 From: Laurens Blankers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Can't open display with PuTTY and xinit 1.3.4-1 References: <54AA7624.1050205@blankersfamily.com> <54AACA74.3080201@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: <54AACA74.3080201@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On 5-1-2015 18:31, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Wait, are you talking about a Windows version of PuTTY? There is a PuTTY for *nix? And it has been ported to Cygwin? I didn't know. That is, let's say, amazing :-) Yes I mean the native PuTTY for Windows. > This will be added to the FAQ in due course. Thank you. > BTW, reverting this behaviour isn't an option either, as it will > actually become the upstream default in the next major release of the > X server. I am perfectly fine with keeping this behaviour since it is more secure, especially if it becomes the default. An entry in the FAQ is perfect. -- Laurens _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/