From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22064 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2015 14:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 22048 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jan 2015 14:22:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out3-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:22:34 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8BE2068F for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:22:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:22:31 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [86.141.128.111]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7CF4B68009E; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:22:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54CCE51F.8080703@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:22:00 -0000 From: Jon TURNEY Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin.xfree To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com CC: jofferman@gmail.com Subject: Re: build error on 1.16.2-1 References: <5481BEDF.1000807@dronecode.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <5481BEDF.1000807@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On 05/12/2014 14:19, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 01/12/2014 23:37, J. Offerman wrote: >> This is an obvious source-header discrepancy. The source >> file(auto-generated anyway) doesn't seem to be changed recently, while >> the header file(glext.h) has a timestamp of Nov 16 now. So it looks >> like only the header file got advanced here. Looking at the >> announcements, it should be the Mesa update on Nov 17 that renewed it. >> Should I just add the extra arguments for those 3 funcs in the source >> file as defined in the new header file? That looks like working. > > Thanks for drawing this to my attention. > > Yes, it seems that the the glext.h header file (which comes from Khronos > via the w32api-headers package) now has the fix (svn r27313) to add the > extra argument to the prototype, but the XML used for the generated code > (which comes from Khronos via the khronos-opengl-registry package) is > only on svn r27116. > > I'm afraid you'll have to fix this manually until I generate a new > khronos-opengl-registry package This build issue should be resolved with khronos-opengl-registry 20141230_svn27684-1 and xorg-server 1.16.3-1 -- Jon TURNEY Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/