From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29160 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2013 00:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 29144 invoked by uid 89); 30 Sep 2013 00:54:38 -0000 Received: from 99.f7bed1.client.atlantech.net (HELO calypso.tux.org) (209.190.247.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:54:38 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calypso.tux.org Received: by calypso.tux.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 920ADD180CC; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:54:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 100.1.74.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bagleyd@tux.org) by calypso.tux.org with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:54:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <56191.100.1.74.8.1380502475.squirrel@calypso.tux.org> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:54:00 -0000 Subject: 2 button keypad From: bagleyd@tux.org To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 Hi I am a long time user. And I love the new 64 bit version seems to cleared up all my virus scanner induced problems. On two different laptops I noticed that -emulate3buttons 100 (or without the 100) is ignored. I don't have 2 button mouse only 2 button mousepads. This used to work. For Toshiba, I don't know of a work around. For my Lenovo, I activated a middle button (but for consistency I would always like the two button way to always work). According to documentation its deactivated if you don't have a 2 button button mouse... so a 2 button keypad does not seem to qualify? It seems to me it should never be deactivated if someone requests it. -- Cheers, /X\ David A. Bagley (( X bagleyd@tux.org http://www.tux.org/~bagleyd/ \X/ xlockmore and more -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/