public inbox for cygwin-xfree@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Cc: ncokwqc02@sneakemail.com
Subject: Re: Persistent CYGWIN/X server taskbar button with urxvt in CYGWIN-64, not rxvt in CYGWIN-32. Why?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565C6EE5.7070103@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20151129T035407-584@post.gmane.org>

On 29/11/2015 02:56, John J Ottusch wrote:
> I use CYGWIN a lot with 64-bit Windows 7 and have been transitioning
> from 32-bit CYGWIN to 64-bit CYGWIN primarily in hopes of avoiding
> repeated STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors.
>
> If I could set up 64-bit CYGWIN (= C64) to behave exactly the same way
> as my 32-bit CYGWIN (= C32) set up I would, but the applications don't
> match up exactly and they don't behave exactly the same way.
>
> One difference I notice is that opening a urxvt in C64 creates a
> separate button associated with the Cygwin/X server process in the
> taskbar, whereas opening an rxvt in C32 does not. (rxvt is not available
> as a C64 application, but I would expect urxvt to operate similarly). In

Yes, please use rxvt-unicode (urxvt). rxvt has been dead upstream for a 
decade.

> both cases an icon for the Cygwin/X server process shows up in the
> notification area.
>
> Both are started from a Windows shortcut:
>
> C32 target:
> C:\win32app\cygwin\bin\run.exe C:\win32app\cygwin\rxvtermX.bat
>
> C64 target:
> C:\win64app\cygwin\bin\run.exe C:\win64app\cygwin\urxvtermX.bat
>
> The batch files that run are similar. Both start 'XWin' if it is not
> already running, then run 'rxvt/urxvt'.
>
[...]
> I prefer NOT to have the taskbar button for the Cygwin/X server process
> show up. Having an icon show up in the notification area is cleaner.
>
> Why are they behaving differently? Is there a way to make the urxvt
> version (C64) behave like the rxvt version (C32)?

I think this is not a problem with the X server, but with the Cygwin run 
utility, which is supposed to run the .bat file with a hidden console.

See [1] a previous discussion of this problem.

I've built an x86_64 run.exe with that patch applied and uploaded it at 
[2].  Perhaps you could try that and see if it improves things.

[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2012-08/msg00000.html
[2] ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwinx/x86_64/run.exe

-- 
Jon TURNEY
Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-29  6:00 John J Ottusch
2015-11-30 15:44 ` Jon Turney [this message]
2015-12-02  0:17 John J Ottusch
2015-12-03 13:47 ` Jon Turney
2015-12-10  0:03 John J Ottusch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565C6EE5.7070103@dronecode.org.uk \
    --to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
    --cc=cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com \
    --cc=ncokwqc02@sneakemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).