public inbox for cygwin-xfree@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Evans <richard.evans@datanomic.com> To: <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>, "Jon TURNEY" <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> Subject: RE: Mouse offset when using java swing based gui applications Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:39:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <974066EF77EEA44EB8AED6ADA05DBD0202038CEE@THHS2EXBE1X.hostedservice2.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4C474580.3090309@dronecode.org.uk> Yes, my experience is the same as yours. The menus test starts with the frame hidden off the top left, as before, but when I move the window, the menus _do_ work OK. Apps which set an initial location (add jframe.setLocation(400, 400); after the pack() call) appear correctly and the menus still work. Interestingly with the 1.7.3 XWin, the app would appear in the right place but would tend to snap back to the top left if you tried to resize the window. This does not seem to happen with the patched server. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Jon TURNEY [mailto:jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk] Sent: 21 July 2010 20:08 To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Richard Evans Subject: Re: Mouse offset when using java swing based gui applications On 19/07/2010 17:27, Richard Evans wrote: > I've attached a small test case which shows the menu problems. Thanks very much, that was very helpful in investigating this problem. > This menu behaviour has been seen for all versions of JDK 1.6 as far as > I remember; it certainly happens with 1.6u3 and 1.6u4. Yes, I wasn't testing what I thought I was testing, and was completely wrong when I said sun bug #6434227 was fixed in the JRE that it claims it's fixed in. It's fixed in JDK1.7 and OpenJDK, but that bug lies when it says the fix is in 1.6 as well. However, it does identify what's going wrong. The significant difference in XDecoratedPeer.java between 1.6u21 and a fixed version is: --- /opt/wip/jdk-1_6_0/j2se/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XDecoratedPeer.j ava 2010-07-21 15:46:33.281250000 +0100 +++ /opt/wip/openjdk/jdk/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XDecoratedPeer.java 2010-06-21 22:15:43.000000000 +0100 @@ -752,79 +748,69 @@ Point newLocation = targetBounds.getLocation(); - if (xe.get_send_event()) { + if (xe.get_send_event() || runningWM == XWM.NO_WM || XWM.isNonReparentingWM()) { // Location, Client size + insets newLocation = new Point(xe.get_x() - currentInsets.left, xe.get_y() - currentInsets.top); } else { // CDE/MWM/Metacity/Sawfish bug: if shell is resized using // top or left border, we don't receive synthetic // ConfigureNotify, only the one from X with zero // coordinates. This is the workaround to get real // location, 6261336 - // Do the same for non-reparenting WMs (Compiz, Looking Glass) switch (XWM.getWMID()) { case XWM.CDE_WM: case XWM.MOTIF_WM: case XWM.METACITY_WM: case XWM.SAWFISH_WM: - case XWM.COMPIZ_WM: - case XWM.LG3D_WM: { Point xlocation = queryXLocation(); if (log.isLoggable(Level.FINE)) { log.log(Level.FINE, "New X location: {0}", new Object[]{String.valueOf(xlocation)}); } if (xlocation != null) { newLocation = xlocation; } break; } default: break; } } Location updates from ConfigureNotify are not processed in the NO_WM case, presumably causing the menus behave as if the window was still located where it was created. There are 2 possible workarounds which occur to me: (i) Lie and pretend we are a non-reparenting WM on the list that AWT knows about, like LG3D. This one of the workarounds suggested in the manpage for dwm (a non-reparenting, tiling WM) Unfortunately, we have to tell a more lies to get AWT to accept this lie, and in particular, we have to claim to support EWMH, which the internal WM doesn't really (although it should), so I'm not too keen on this approach. (ii) Alternatively, it's a straightforward workaround to add to the internal WM to cause it to send synthetic ConfigureNotify for these windows when a non-synthetic ConfigureNotify occurs. From a quick test, this approach seems to work ok. But the Java window still appears with the frame off the top-left, rather than getting nudged away from the origin so the frame is visible, which is rather mysterious. I've uploaded a build with this change at [1], patch to follow. Perhaps you could try it out and see if it works for you? [1] ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwinx/XWin.20100721-git-2704058015f198ce.exe.bz2 -- Jon TURNEY Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 8:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-07-13 21:57 Jonas Winkler 2010-07-15 13:38 ` Jon TURNEY 2010-07-15 14:41 ` Richard Evans 2010-07-19 15:51 ` Jon TURNEY 2010-07-19 16:28 ` Richard Evans 2010-07-21 19:07 ` Jon TURNEY 2010-07-21 19:11 ` [PATCH] Cygwin/X: Internal WM workaround for Java AWT bug Jon TURNEY 2010-07-22 8:39 ` Richard Evans [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=974066EF77EEA44EB8AED6ADA05DBD0202038CEE@THHS2EXBE1X.hostedservice2.net \ --to=richard.evans@datanomic.com \ --cc=cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com \ --cc=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).