From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-xfree-return-17532-listarch-cygwin-xfree=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 19293 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 09:59:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-xfree-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 19278 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 09:59:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO meg.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de) (134.109.132.57)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 09:59:03 -0000
Received: from hermes.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.175])
	by meg.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1ATedy-0002UB-Co
	for cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:59:02 +0100
Received: from herein.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
	([134.109.132.165] helo=stargate.ago.vpn ident=[qkR/3+NZieK0mu5Tw5Yp3X+taddy0Ox+])
	by mailbox.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1ATedx-0003Yw-RZ
	for cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:59:02 +0100
Received: from lupus.ago.vpn (lupus.ago.vpn [192.168.26.203])
	by stargate.ago.vpn (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 4181918E91
	for <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>; Tue,  9 Dec 2003 10:52:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lupus.ago.vpn (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2028FE7
	for <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>; Tue,  9 Dec 2003 10:52:19 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:59:00 -0000
From: Alexander Gottwald <Alexander.Gottwald@s1999.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [Xoncygwin-cvs] CVS Update: cygwin-xfree-doc (branch: trunk)
In-Reply-To: <ud6ay631h.wl@zakki@peppermint.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0312091050010.11224@lupus.ago.vpn>
References: <E1AScdm-0001Di-00@sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net> <3FD21B1E.9010303@msu.edu>
 <Pine.LNX.4.55.0312062041250.26333@lupus.ago.vpn>
 <Pine.LNX.4.55.0312090237120.11224@lupus.ago.vpn> <ud6ay631h.wl@zakki@peppermint.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 2.60 Textanalyse (0.0 Punkte)
	Fragen an/questions to:  Postmaster TU Chemnitz <postmaster@tu-chemnitz.de>
	--- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse
X-Scan-Signature: 706061e527a23eaab6b0df22823cde1c
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2
List-Id: <cygwin-xfree.sourceware.org>

Kensuke Matsuzaki wrote:

> It seems like new rootless code were partly overwritten by old code,
> and Neither New and old rootless mode does't work.

I think the commit mail will get though today and contains the full
patch. Can you then take a look on the patch and remove everything
but the wrongly commited chunks and apply the patch as reverse?

bye
    ago
-- 
 Alexander.Gottwald@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
 http://www.gotti.org           ICQ: 126018723