From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11479 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2003 07:36:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-xfree-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-xfree-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 11472 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 07:36:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO meg.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de) (134.109.132.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 07:36:46 -0000 Received: from hedwig.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.173] helo=mailbox.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de) by meg.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1ATytq-0005Ng-1p for cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:46 +0100 Received: from odoaker.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.94] ident=[KnJpLvcIvJZmOkg+pdeERhK+erYGOlQy]) by mailbox.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1ATytp-0003Nr-WB for cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:45 +0100 Received: from localhost (goal@localhost) by odoaker.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBA7ajL11519 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:45 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: odoaker.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de: goal owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:36:00 -0000 From: Alexander Gottwald To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: RE: [Xoncygwin-cvs] CVS Update: cygwin-xfree-doc (branch: trunk) In-Reply-To: <2FAEFC2A851BD211AD820008C7286BA403F99968@NBIZ205> Message-ID: References: <2FAEFC2A851BD211AD820008C7286BA403F99968@NBIZ205> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 2.60 Textanalyse (0.0 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: 706061e527a23eaab6b0df22823cde1c X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 List-Id: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Pille Geert (bizvdm) wrote: > Hallo, > > Will the "rootless" option be removed? Or do I get this ("everything that > smelled like rootless") wrong? There is new code for rootless so I've tried not to copy the old code. bye ago -- Alexander.Gottwald@s1999.tu-chemnitz.de http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723