public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Updated: postgresql-7.2-2
@ 2002-02-28  9:16 Fergus Daly
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fergus Daly @ 2002-02-28  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin; +Cc: f.daly

On his announcement of the updated postgresql-7.2.2, Jason Tishler wrote :

>>  WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING
>>  Note that this distribution will *not* function correctly with Cygwin
>>  1.3.9-1.  If you want to use this distribution, then you *must* upgrade
>>  your Cygwin DLL to a recent snapshot (i.e., 2002-Feb-10 or later)
>>  or to the next release after 1.3.9-1 (when available).
>>  WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING

Now that the Cygwin DLL has advanced from 1.3.9-1 to 1.3.10-1 does this mean
it's OK to reinstate postgresql-7.2.2? If it is, do we do it ourselves by an
explicit
intervention using setup.ini, or will setup.ini "see to it" for us (at some
stage).

This is not a nag (as in "1.3.9 -> 1.3.10 happened just now, so what's
happening  about postgresql, then?"), or it's not meant to be anyway : I ask
because although I think I know how to manage this for myself, I really
don't know whether I should.

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Updated: postgresql-7.2-2
       [not found] <B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E848F@MCDC-ATL-5>
@ 2002-02-12  6:53 ` Jason Tishler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Tishler @ 2002-02-12  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heitzso; +Cc: Cygwin

Heitzso,

Please keep your replies on-list...

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:59:08AM -0500, Heitzso wrote:
> I just upgraded cygwin, which I do on a regular basis,
> and picked up the new postgresql.  Some glitches ...
> 
> 	no automated version upgrade of db is provided
> 	not certain this is a big deal, 
> 	cygwin is supposed to be used by developers
> 	I didn't have anything crucial stored in the
> 	db, it's used as a cacheing mechanism on my development
> 	system for a distributed database project with Census.
> 	Anyway, figured simple initdb followed by a createdb
> 	would suffice ...

If would like to contribute this, then I will add it to my next release.

> 	createdb breaks with an "unable to locate dll"
> 	cygreadline5.dll could not be found, etc.
> 	I've searched my drive and cannot find cygreadline5.dll

Search the mailing list for the solution to the above.  Your problem is
*not* caused by upgrading to postgresql-7.2-2.

> 	[[ uh oh, read my mail and note the WARNING WARNING ]]
> 
> 	your warning notes that cygwin must be CVS snapshot ..
> 	I find this awkward, if it requires a cvs snapshot then
> 	perhaps postgres should not have been released via
> 	primary upgrade mechanism ... ?? i.e. I use the cygwin
> 	install tool several times a week but I've never bothered
> 	to pull down cvs snapshots ...

Sigh...  You can never please everyone.  I almost held off releasing
postgresql-7.2-2, but I didn't want to wait an unknown amount of time
for the next Cygwin release.  I guess that I could have marked the
release "test".

> 	I downgraded postgresql via cygwin install tool
> 	and reinit'ed my db with initdb and tried
> 	to rerun createdb and got the same error message
> 	re cygreadline5.dll.

See above.

> 	BTW, I've got every package except rcs from cygwin
> 	(via cygwin install tool) 
> 	loaded on this box so cygreadline5 is a mystery.

See above.

> Net is I'm left with a non-functioning postgresql even after
> downgrading to prior release.  Ouch.

See above.

> Don't know if you could pressure cygwin group to release
> a new cygwin that provided cygreadline5.dll and anything
> else required by the latest/greatest postgresql?

No, I would not "pressure" anyone.  You *do* realize that people
contribute their time and packages.  Right?

Did I say, "see above?"

> Anyway, if more than a few folks are using this you could
> have a minor SNAFU on your hands.

Gee thanks.  It's email such as this one sent privately, that make me
want to de-contribute packages.  Sigh...

Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-28 16:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-28  9:16 Updated: postgresql-7.2-2 Fergus Daly
     [not found] <B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E848F@MCDC-ATL-5>
2002-02-12  6:53 ` Jason Tishler

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).