From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andre Oliveira da Costa" To: , "Cygwin" Subject: RE: Linking problems Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:58:00 -0000 Message-id: <001501bf68f0$0cac6e50$8400000a@costa.cadenet.com.br> References: <20000127141435.1607.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-01/msg00462.html > Get a binutils snapshot from Mumit's ftp site or rename collect2 > so that it's > not found and ld is used directly. Mmmh... been there, but the snapshots seem to be older than the binutils package shipped with gcc-2.95.2: (contents of directory /pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygb20/snapshots) binutils-19990808/ dlltool/ gcc-2.95-19990715/ binutils-19990818/ gcc-2.95-19990609/ libstdc++-v3-19990717/ binutils-19990911/ gcc-2.95-19990626/ libstdc++-v3-2.90.7/ I am trying to download binutils-000127.tar.bz2 directly from ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com , but I'm not sure I should use one of Mumit's snapshots instead. Could you (or Mumit, or anybody ;) ) shed some light here? In the meantime, I renamed collect2 to _collect2, and now I got the good old message foo.c: undefined reference to xxxx back. Odd thing: the linker output message appears slowly on my terminal, one char at a time (the rest of the output appears normally). Is this caused by the absence of collect2? TIA. Best regards, Andre -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com