From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18905 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2014 05:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 18894 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2014 05:48:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailout2.w1.samsung.com Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com (HELO mailout2.w1.samsung.com) (210.118.77.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:48:21 +0000 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MZB00BQRS4FU710@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:48:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eusync4.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.214]) by eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 5F.06.23059.02E73D25; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:48:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fedinw7x64 ([106.109.9.113]) by eusync4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0MZB00M2US4F7K70@eusync4.samsung.com> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:48:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Pavel Fedin To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <001701cf0e08$e399abe0$aacd03a0$%fedin@samsung.com> <20140110135208.GG10296@calimero.vinschen.de> <002301cf0e10$6c1ed7e0$445c87a0$%fedin@samsung.com> <20140110150726.GH10296@calimero.vinschen.de> In-reply-to: <20140110150726.GH10296@calimero.vinschen.de> Subject: RE: Bringing up NFS server on 64 bits Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:48:00 -0000 Message-id: <002701cf1023$0e4b0110$2ae10330$%fedin@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 Hello! > Not necessarily. If the package is in a good shape, has no known > security issues, and works fine with the latest Cygwin, you're good. > Other than that, just keep an eye on the Cygwin ML if somebody reported > a problem with your packages and see if you can lend a hand, maybe. This doesn't sound too bad. > This is a generic problem. Maintaining packages does not actually cost > a lot of time, unless you're trying to stick to the bleeding edge or > try to maintain too many packages. But people still shy away from that > without even trying. That's pretty disappointing. Ok, i will try to. So far: Packages to update: rpcgen, nfs-server New package: rpcbind Is rpcgen maintained or not ? And, nobody has answered the question. Who are original authors of this NF= S server ? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple