From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E956E39D5C02 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E956E39D5C02 Received: from Thekla (dyndsl-087-245-030-177-teleos.ewe-ip-backbone.de [87.245.30.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FQwwl7417zyYX for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:00:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas Heckel" To: References: <002e01d73751$e5066840$af1338c0$@uni-bremen.de> <513e44a6-50da-1851-f2db-9c3b1900805b@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <513e44a6-50da-1851-f2db-9c3b1900805b@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Chances for llvm / clang update? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: <003e01d7376f$1912a9b0$4b37fd10$@uni-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: de Thread-Index: AQHba/VPepq+y+Y4NJ10IQPH2C4wZQJMEIeiqqWicwA= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:44 -0000 > From: Andrey Repin > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:47 AM >=20 > https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html is a good > start, I think. See below... > From: Marco Atzeri > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 1:11 PM >=20 > have you started looking to the current cygwin source package > and > patches for hints and guidance ? Thank you for your kind hints. :) > Unfortunately the package is without maintainer, and volunteers > to take > over are lacking. I was not sure on this part. Good to know, for now I was not expecting = anything, just being curious. But since I am interested, I will spent = some time to look into it at some point. Although I feel not very = confident achieving much with my limited knowledge. I will get back to = you, once I have concrete questions I can articulate. Cheers, Andreas