public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Greg Mosier" <Greg.Mosier@USA.Net>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 20:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006001c1ab9e$8a65e2c0$0100a8c0@gregmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01f501c1ab68$b8a62810$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>

From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Subject: Re: Why not a news server?


> > to go back to the list.  The most frustrating thing about this is that
> this
> > is a setting in the listserv software, whether it be elzm, mailman,
> > majordomo, or listserv.  The person that has set this up has
> configured it
> > so that the default reply to address is that of the send instead of
> the
> > list.  A simple change in the configuration would alleviate that and
>
> This too has been debated ad inifinitum. There are valid points for and
> against doing this.
>
> However, the principal of least surprise requires not doing it, and for
> a list that gets many non-subscriber posts, that *also* prohibits
> rewriting the reply-to.

Well, the valid arguement against that, would of course be, if they want an
answer bad enough have them search the archives of the list for it, or else
join the list for the short time that it takes them to resolve their issue.
I mean, really, should a list be supportive of it's long standing members or
people that don't have the time to invest in finding an answer for
themselves via subbing or searching archives.

Just my two cents,
Greg Mosier



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-02  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-01  9:59 Andrew DeFaria
2002-02-01 10:20 ` Randall R Schulz
2002-02-01 10:26 ` Daniel Adams
2002-02-01 10:48   ` Peter Buckley
2002-02-01 10:28 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-02-01 12:29   ` Stephano Mariani
2002-02-01 13:25     ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
     [not found]   ` <4.3.1.2.20020201143046.01cb6770@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
2002-02-01 12:49     ` Andrew DeFaria
2002-02-01 13:15       ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-02-01 13:33         ` Greg Mosier
2002-02-01 13:37           ` Robert Collins
2002-02-01 20:05             ` Greg Mosier [this message]
2002-02-01 13:48           ` Charles Wilson
2002-02-01 20:10             ` Greg Mosier
2002-02-01 20:48               ` Charles Wilson
2002-02-01 13:31 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-02-05 15:30 Andrew DeFaria
2002-02-05 15:43 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-02-05 16:05 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-02-05 16:19   ` Andrew DeFaria
2002-02-05 17:44     ` Christopher Faylor
2002-02-05 16:35   ` James Potts (Arek)
2002-02-05 17:35     ` Christopher Faylor
2002-02-17  5:39   ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-02-17 15:52     ` Daniel Adams
2002-02-17 17:57       ` Christopher Faylor
2002-02-19 15:47         ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-02 14:29           ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-02 14:46             ` Daniel Adams
2002-03-02 14:50               ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-02 15:07               ` Charles Wilson
2002-03-02 15:10                 ` Daniel Adams
2002-03-02 15:20                 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-03-02 15:31                   ` Daniel Adams
2002-03-02 15:33                   ` Charles Wilson
2002-03-02 16:02                     ` Andrew DeFaria
2002-03-02 16:30                       ` Charles Wilson
2002-03-02 16:33                         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-03-02 16:45                           ` Charles Wilson
2002-03-02 18:38                             ` Andrew DeFaria
2002-03-02 19:07                               ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-02 14:58             ` Randall R Schulz
2002-02-18  9:27     ` Andrew DeFaria
2002-02-18 10:53 Randall R Schulz
2002-02-18 14:32 ` Andrew DeFaria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006001c1ab9e$8a65e2c0$0100a8c0@gregmo' \
    --to=greg.mosier@usa.net \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).