From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10900 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 18:04:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10892 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2006 18:04:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from host217-40-213-68.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:04:47 +0000 Received: from rainbow ([192.168.1.165]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:04:45 +0000 From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: cygheap base mismatch detected Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <007801c63323$77c6b160$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2 On 16 February 2006 07:17, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > Unfortunately for me, (e) is impractical. It's not clear whether > it is my source code or CygWin's that I need to fix, Have you actually *tried* this application of yours under Cygwin and discovered that it indeed *is* one of the rare ones that actually runs into this problem, or are you getting your knickers in a twist over some entirely theoretical issue that may just as likely never happen? > My project time frame doesn't allow for that. If I read Dave Korn's > posting correctly (along with the others who talk about adjusting the > sizes of Fortran arrays to fix the problem) *Why* are you relying on information that is 12 to 18 months out of date? There's been quite a few check-ins to the cygwin cvs in that period, and in case you haven't noticed, we haven't had anyone here running into that problem recently, and some of the fortran people said that one of the fixes Corinna made _ages_ ago now had solved the problem in their experience, so perhaps you should stop hoping to divine the truth from a priori first principles and outdated mailing-list-posts, and get a bit _empirical_ about it? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/