From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>, <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: no more package moratorium?
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 12:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21@hotmail.com>
That seems a reasonable thing to me.
It does raise an interesting point: who, when, and how, do new packages
get approved?
(I don't mean the physical quality of the packaging either :}).
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:25 AM
Subject: no more package moratorium?
>
> subject asks the question... I gathered that the release of new setup
was
> going to bring the moratorium down ... if so I might start considering
> packaging up nano, assuming I can work out how to patch it
consistantly...
>
> so umm anyone want to give an answer?
>
> Gareth
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>, <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: no more package moratorium?
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 08:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011111082600.xrXLCcwhEgmuMEQxf4iV6E33LuWpNbc-hOuS9GXElJM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21@hotmail.com>
That seems a reasonable thing to me.
It does raise an interesting point: who, when, and how, do new packages
get approved?
(I don't mean the physical quality of the packaging either :}).
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:25 AM
Subject: no more package moratorium?
>
> subject asks the question... I gathered that the release of new setup
was
> going to bring the moratorium down ... if so I might start considering
> packaging up nano, assuming I can work out how to patch it
consistantly...
>
> so umm anyone want to give an answer?
>
> Gareth
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-14 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-02 12:06 Gareth Pearce
2001-11-02 12:19 ` Robert Collins [this message]
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[not found] ` <m3k7wr50fa.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
2001-11-11 8:26 ` tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?] Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jerome BENOIT
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` no more package moratorium? Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jesper Eskilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Gareth Pearce
2001-11-11 8:26 E
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks' \
--to=robert.collins@itdomain.com.au \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=tilps@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).