public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>, <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: no more package moratorium?
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 12:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21@hotmail.com>

That seems a reasonable thing to me.

It does raise an interesting point: who, when, and how, do new packages
get approved?

(I don't mean the physical quality of the packaging either :}).

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:25 AM
Subject: no more package moratorium?


>
> subject asks the question... I gathered that the release of new setup
was
> going to bring the moratorium down ... if so I might start considering
> packaging up nano, assuming I can work out how to patch it
consistantly...
>
> so umm anyone want to give an answer?
>
> Gareth
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>, <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: no more package moratorium?
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 08:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011111082600.xrXLCcwhEgmuMEQxf4iV6E33LuWpNbc-hOuS9GXElJM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21@hotmail.com>

That seems a reasonable thing to me.

It does raise an interesting point: who, when, and how, do new packages
get approved?

(I don't mean the physical quality of the packaging either :}).

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:25 AM
Subject: no more package moratorium?


>
> subject asks the question... I gathered that the release of new setup
was
> going to bring the moratorium down ... if so I might start considering
> packaging up nano, assuming I can work out how to patch it
consistantly...
>
> so umm anyone want to give an answer?
>
> Gareth
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-02 12:06 Gareth Pearce
2001-11-02 12:19 ` Robert Collins [this message]
2001-11-11  8:26   ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26   ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-11-11  8:26     ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
     [not found]       ` <m3k7wr50fa.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
2001-11-11  8:26         ` tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?] Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11  8:26               ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11  8:26               ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26                 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11  8:26                   ` Jerome BENOIT
2001-11-11  8:26                     ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26       ` no more package moratorium? Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26         ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26               ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26                 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26                   ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26                   ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11  8:26       ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11  8:26         ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11  8:26     ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26       ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26       ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26       ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11  8:26         ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11  8:26         ` Jesper Eskilson
2001-11-11  8:26           ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11  8:26             ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26         ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11  8:26 ` Gareth Pearce
2001-11-11  8:26 E

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks' \
    --to=robert.collins@itdomain.com.au \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    --cc=tilps@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).