Re: 2/13 PM NAV update [Correction]

Re: 2/13 PM NAV update [Correction]

[Randall R Schulz]

Bill,

I noticed an error in my previous message.


>A better way to detect an alteration to a program is to use the "sum" 
>command to generate a checksum. As I mentioned in my first resonse to Hong 
>Xun, sum on my installed copy of the 1.3-6 cygz.dll yields this:

CORRECTION: I have the 1.3-7 (current) version installed, not the previous 
1.3-6 and this is the 1.3-7 version's checksum:

>% sum /bin/cygz.dll
>19649    50


For completeness, the rest of my original message, unchanged, follows...


>For the 1.3-6 version the result is:
>
>% sum cygz.dll
>04409    49
>
>
>I did another LiveUpdate of my NAV virus descriptions (getting 30 new 
>definitions, as you pointed out) and ran it on the 1.3-7 (latest) cygz.dll 
>and still got no "hit." However, the new descriptions do seem to detect 
>the "Backdoor Egghead" virus in the 1.3-6 version of cygz.dll.
>
>I am dubious that that DLL is really infected with a virus...Surely the 
>pattern detection of NAV is susceptible to false positives, no?
>
>There's another interesting thing here: Clicking the "Virus Info..." 
>button in the detection notification dialog displays a virus information 
>dialog that, among other things, says that the virus length is 0 (zero) 
>bytes. How dangerous could and empty "virus" be?
>
>Not that it matters, I'm not using that DLL and am unlikely to "downgrade" 
>to it.
>
>I'd be mildly interested in a full and complete explanation of what's 
>going on here, but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it or investigate 
>any further.
>
>Randall Schulz
>Mountain View, CA USA


At 22:03 2002-02-13, Bill Siegmund wrote:
>Hongxun & Randall,
>
>This morning my NAV was still current as of 2/7 and protecting me against 
>58723 viruses.
>
>'Round 4PM PST I got an update that made me current as of 2/13 and saw the 
>count of viruses jump by 30.
>
>And after that the two CYGZ.DLLs on my disks began to be flagged as 
>infected by the Backdoor Egghead virus.
>
>I deleted them and did a complete scan that turned up _no_ infected files.
>
>On running "setup",  I got a version of CYGZ.DLL that the current version 
>of NAV considers clean.
>
>For  the record it is dated 1/20/02 11:42a and contains 50,688 Bytes.
>
>Bill Siegmund
>Cal-Tex Computers, Inc.
>1080 Rebecca Dr.
>Boulder Creek, California 95006


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 2/13 PM NAV update [Correction]

[Robert Collins]

Please, for the sake of sanity, don't refer to packages by .dll
revisions. libz is separate from cygwin1.dll and updated at different
times.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 2/13 PM NAV update [Correction of Corrections]

[Randall R Schulz]

Robert,

The numbers I gave were all zlib package release numbers, not Cygwin 
release numbers.

Well.... Except for the fact that I systematically used these:

INCORRECT:      1.3-6 or 1.3-7


when I meant these:

CORRECT:        1.1.3-6 and 1.1.3-7


Sorry

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 22:46 2002-02-13, you wrote:
>Please, for the sake of sanity, don't refer to packages by .dll revisions. 
>libz is separate from cygwin1.dll and updated at different times.
>
>Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/