From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 109276 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2017 15:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 109204 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2017 15:06:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=intervention, dash, yesterday X-HELO: limerock04.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock04.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.244) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:06:08 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id v6PF66ud027185 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:06:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (mta-68-175-129-7.twcny.rr.com [68.175.129.7] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id v6PF64Hp010654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:06:05 -0400 Subject: Re: how to access and display apps that I've launched To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1438727230.474852.1500993486132.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1438727230.474852.1500993486132@mail.yahoo.com> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <00ecf4fe-157d-531c-1f6c-af38aaf3a477@cornell.edu> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438727230.474852.1500993486132@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Cornell-Gauge: Gauge=XXXXX X-PMX-CORNELL-AUTH-RESULTS: dkim-out=none; X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 On 7/25/2017 10:38 AM, Ian Lambert via cygwin wrote: > > I'm using 64 bit > cygwin already. This is a difference from the OP (It was in > my earlier post). > > Sorry, I > missed that. Have you looked at the output of 'rebase > -is'? > Conflicts are marked with > '*'. What about BLODA? > > = = = > > I had not. It may be worth mentioning I have not found rebase > in the fine manual, even under cygwin utilities. I only find > it mentioned in forum posts, and with 4 rebase* programs > under /usr/bin, it's playing too much monte carlo games with > the install to just try those. > Obviously something is not right; here is output from "rebase -is": > > rebase: failed to open rebase database "/etc/rebase.db.x86_64": > No such file or directory Normally you don't ever need to think about rebasing on x86_64. The perpetual postinstall script /etc/postinstall/0p_000_autorebase.dash should handle everything without any manual intervention. You might try running that script (and the rebaselst script that it calls) line by line (preferably in a dash shell started directly from Windows, with no other Cygwin processes running) to see if you can figure out what's going wrong. > "locate rebase.db" gives: > /cygdrive/e/cygwin64-3/etc/rebase.db.x86_64 > so it was apparently there when running locate database updates > yesterday at ~1130-1330 (Eastern US), before doing the > "rebase-trigger full", shutdown/restart, setup. > > BLODA is certainly a possibility; Symantec Protection is on the job... > It was playing well together before, but things do change. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple