From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hughes To: "'Geoffrey Noer'" , Ed Peschko Cc: "earnie_boyd@hotmail.com" , "gnu-win32@cygnus.com" Subject: RE: performance of cygwin32 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 04:11:00 -0000 Message-id: <01BD1CF7.2085A050@rodney.wg.icl.co.uk> X-SW-Source: 1998-01/msg00153.html Dear all, I have been chasing performance problems with our build system which ran on unix and is Snail like on NT (i.e. it is unusable). I have just discovered more or less the same BUT think the problem is the NT networking not gnuwin32. To support this I timed ls to local and networked drives - wow the network took 10 times as the local drive and dir took around the same ratio (if not more). Does anyone know how to asses NT network peformance? Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Geoffrey Noer [SMTP:noer@cygnus.com] Sent: 08 January 1998 05:42 To: Ed Peschko Cc: earnie_boyd@hotmail.com; gnu-win32@cygnus.com Subject: Re: performance of cygwin32 Ed Peschko wrote: > > Win32 is slow, but network drives are *glacial*, at least with cygwin32 > tools. I've installed the coolview update (when will it be incorporated > into the 'vanilla' cygwin32 tools anyways?) and it is going a bit faster. The "coolview" sources represent a state of the actual Cygnus development tree as of whenever that was made. It's made more progress since then; right now I'm battling race conditions in the signal code... Right now I can do a complete configure of the compiler tools (including tcl/tk) in about 20 minutes and build them in an hour 15 min. which is a huge improvement performance-wise. But signal handling isn't quite as robust as it needs to be... -- Geoffrey Noer noer@cygnus.com - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help". - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".