public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@syncretize.net>
To: "Peter A. Castro" <doctor@fruitbat.org>, <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: New setup pre-release - feedback needed
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <023301c22d67$02fea740$d500a8c0@study2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0207162353170.8342-100000@gremlin.fruitbat.org>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter A. Castro" <doctor@fruitbat.org>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:15 PM


> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > We're coming up on a new release of setup.exe, with a number of user
> > interface enhancements to make it more obvious what setup is doing when
it
> > 'pauses'.
>
> While I do like the status of knowing just what setup is scanning as part
> of the package loading process, it now takes much, much longer to load
> from an "Install from Local Directory" scenario :-) (up from 5 seconds to
> about 1 minute, 45 seconds).  It's a kind of a rare scenario (I'm
> probably one of the few who keeps a full downloaded image of all of
> cygwin (kinda like a mirror site)), and it's not like I run setup more
> than once every few days, so it's an adequate trade-off for more status
> on the package load.

This is actually the MD5 checking, not the feedback. (I implemented the
feedback so that we won't get 'setup takes forever on local installs' :} ).

> > It *should* be bug free, although there may be a minor bug with
> > autodetection of upgrades (we have one report, but no debugging info).
>
> I did some test installs and re/de-installs and it appears to work well.
> The only thing I did notice was that during the actual package
> installation part, the Progress bar is showing "full" when it's installed
> only about 3/4ths of the files from the package.  I noticed this more
> with source packages than binaries, but did see it a few times with some
> binary-only package installs.  It's really just a cosmetic thing and
> didn't seem to effect the actual installation.  I view it as a reversal
> of the old '98% finished' phenomenon :-)

Hmm. Thats strange - I suspect it's a race of some sort with the gui updates
(we have two threads for blocking IO operations - one to do the UI, one to
do the IO.) Nothing much has changed there, which is why it's strange.

Thanks for the feedback,
Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-17  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-13 12:21 Robert Collins
2002-07-15 22:13 ` Joerg R. Schaible
2002-07-17  3:11 ` Peter A. Castro
2002-07-17  3:24   ` Robert Collins [this message]
2002-07-18  2:42     ` Peter A. Castro
2002-07-17 11:59   ` Max Bowsher
2002-07-16  8:22 Demmer, Thomas
2002-07-16  8:41 ` Robert Collins
2002-07-16 13:18 Harig, Mark A.
2002-07-16 14:36 ` Max Bowsher
2002-07-17  3:26   ` Robert Collins
2002-07-17 11:43     ` Max Bowsher
2002-07-16 18:18 ` Robert Collins
2002-07-17  6:56 John Vincent
2002-07-17  9:26 Harig, Mark A.
2002-07-17  9:56 ` Robert Collins
2002-07-17 10:12 Harig, Mark A.
2002-07-17 11:25 Harig, Mark A.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='023301c22d67$02fea740$d500a8c0@study2' \
    --to=robert.collins@syncretize.net \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    --cc=doctor@fruitbat.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).