From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6411 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 02:25:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6377 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 02:25:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO itdomain003.itdomain.net.au) (203.63.157.208) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 02:25:17 -0000 Received: from lifelesswks ([203.51.0.200]) by itdomain003.itdomain.net.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779); Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:25:16 +1100 Message-ID: <062801c19a47$3653c660$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Jon Leichter" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:25:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2002 02:25:16.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[351C7EE0:01C19A47] X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00715.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Leichter" > > See above why it doesn't. mingw != cygwin :}. > > If 'build' WERE to be tested automatically, independent to 'host', it would > come up with 'i686-pc-cygwin'. Thus, we'd effectively end up with the same > line you specified above. So that does work, right? Or are you trying to > confuse me again??? :) What doesn't kill us makes us stronger. IF build were tested correctly yes. But it's not currently tested - it defaults to host IFF host is defined. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/