From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130168 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2020 08:38:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 130160 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2020 08:38:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Received:Sun, Based, ASSI, assi X-HELO: mail-wr1-f45.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f45.google.com) (209.85.221.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:38:17 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id c14so7228702wrn.7 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 00:38:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/f2UTkeOZbKGwmLg2lt9BmsOP/WA3S/w0KSIt2Ib3gA=; b=rn+Ph1Lc1acWC1LSqAOtECFs6p+JmiXiubIuVwu3hJSDr1daDOs19dEBBqncMnJzfV fb0hoqfQGambG7i7IHvBd5gI0bychbfD+jXzaq2aA9jYi3rIOPBjehGDS87i3fHi/nBb sz2MbWI+AmRjU1r+sgYr0HRDUSbQ/MQYF3OSr05+Sl+/gVFsl8zg4Sx9BK5BqxkgC12v uTOAuRYd64qMtQh4fdzyKwrT4OVEOLTYKC4dXjCjIrHSI75byvHUc2ZR8St/e9f6OPJ6 g/c+gZAx+TlJKDWB3Idj/gt1qJcRiN//tVlUxSAlOH5uGU+eJR4FgWsFbsmrKQ3oIFGt WIzg== Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ee:6727:2e01:c06d:de49:c95c:9877? (p200300EE67272E01C06DDE49C95C9877.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ee:6727:2e01:c06d:de49:c95c:9877]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm15145661wrx.42.2020.01.26.00.38.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 00:38:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <2904b4fa-6349-bd3e-c4ff-4b32a0bb3838@gmail.com> <87y2tvs278.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <08ac898e-e7f9-c8e9-91ba-d4ee33f2e27c@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 Am 26.01.2020 um 09:05 schrieb ASSI: > Marco Atzeri writes: >> at least I know that is not just my machine. >> When I released the package was >> >> >> libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst >> ............................... PASS 90/90 > > Based on the test name there may be an assumption built into the code > about how the filesystem behaves that isn't guaranteed on Windows/Cygwin > or even POSIX. If it's simply an error condition not getting checked it > should be reproducible under debugging, but you're mostly out of luck if > it's relying on a specific order or atomicity of certain operations, as > debugging will almost always serialize the execution to the point where > these types of errors do not manifest. > > > Regards, > Achim. the other problem of debugging is that the backtrace is trash after the segfault and that of course Octave is a 400 Kg gorilla with all its dependencies.. I will try anyway Thanks Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple