From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <10walls@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B293858024 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:42:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 32B293858024 Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id l70so3197384pga.1 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EdVWMlmWRjr7l/jGwF6gxLpgoPVmyZRehPpGl7eV5PQ=; b=LWbnLCW677kQduRmgDuHyoxg3KEWBoCe1YRmBjyMVLAHOnyc8t154SyC368V3MOSzm n4UJ+ecJGEi3aXpwV6tXjiAdSomfDkzD5vx06zUwcGiL/LacGzjzgj2JNox+b3+vSBSq aBUScw5HWZVmFff5QQro+7l6RHqBS5rqt/MEcgfRNmX/dudTBG7DQi0QulFdDiqHLw9k PTCPLCoCM/IAVocHkJQHfhMzfqPPvlQu7WrDBwi8gs8nY304uvzyFxiGk9KP3QDbElCR YfebFb/0MeIQ7UF2XxyFQ72FJtlKAl5YXP/1noFwaqQlmMAjfy55FRnMGK1ym5zb+DoH kJ8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PO+QzykewJUSw9uDx/hI0oEf5ANqpqSOqeVjfq7FZQI924sFu 2tekeowwhffTIvomJnfPfUonPvqV+eo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzloiHIVMQdPtoC/CRh5cG/kbZSEf/T8G9hR31Ccr5XkK66YQKGYiPDtrJaRLMzmEsVNw90/g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1348:b029:2b5:7e51:59e9 with SMTP id k8-20020a056a001348b02902b57e5159e9mr20605010pfu.65.1620816128146; Wed, 12 May 2021 03:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:f40:91b::7292? ([2001:f40:91b::7292]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b17sm1486216pgb.71.2021.05.12.03.42.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 May 2021 03:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Jonathan Yong <10walls@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0c2f908b-d3ac-5bd6-92b1-c2bd0970ec24@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:42:08 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:42:10 -0000 On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote: > Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: >> The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both >> architectures to the latest upstream release version: >> >>   gcc-11.1.0-0.1 > Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if compiled > with gcc -O2; gcc -O1 works, gcc 10 also works. > Thomas > >>   mingw64-i686-gcc-11.1.0-0.1 >>   mingw64-x86_64-gcc-11.1.0-0.1 >> >> This test release includes libgccjit as a separate package for the >> native toolchain on both architectures.  Since Cygwin can't use ASLR any >> nontrivial dynamic objects that get created in this way will likely need >> to get rebased before they can be used (especially on 32bit).  It is >> unlikely that build systems recognize the need for doing that at the >> moment. >> >> Please test these compilers with your packages and applications as >> extensively as possible (especially if you are a Cygwin package >> maintainer).  Unless problems are found that necessitate another round >> of testing, the plan is to bootstrap the support libraries with the new >> toolchain and do a non-test update in about two to four weeks. >> > > Does stripping the optimized executable fix things? Are you also able to produce a minimal test case?