From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26452 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 01:09:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 26439 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 01:09:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lifelesslap.robertcollins.net) (203.221.36.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 01:09:25 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 199x94-0001f8-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:09:26 +1000 Subject: RE: setup.exe: Woe is me! From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc" Organization: Message-Id: <1051492164.887.49.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:41:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg02409.txt.bz2 --=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 514 On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 05:23, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I don't know how much extra effort it'll be, but wouldn't a > "log-on-the-spot" command-line option make sense anyway? Or is that what > you meant? Actually, I just meant building setup with the extant patch to change the logging behaviour. A command line option we can include for releases would be neat. The patch Max has just reposted would be a good basis for that.. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+rH9EI5+kQ8LJcoIRAtkMAJ914zUlriizB3MhdZEwdnXcR7oZRQCgjKHF CZpp/c9vrstbVzyY1eOgrOQ= =ZWQD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc--