From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53900 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2017 06:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 53741 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2017 06:49:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-wr0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f171.google.com) (209.85.128.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 06:49:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c11so14855334wrc.3 for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 23:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j+dw8kvG3BUpRP0yksmXnwI7Wl6O1mYOB2oSNYzuOIE=; b=WUomw+bdLKGvYVBzQxnN1Xl641+9oeB9BrVqSGHNTxrwatLGtGhnNpdfpBV7gG/I4L WWM5qy0zQLbj5qopdf1C1TI/X/0gdX/LHc3HeI8d2qXhd9JOX7bUGnrOAnJcDxzbNpiS OYP4nfIMsC4hibHbRhrn1WTb+2oKyR6UcdhBAfHuG/eMbrtW+OhuuwjfU4aruodJwzkj 8VKSgf/rQBZeMJFQLiRvgokjsDHIFsMWpA0jIk6R46WLZXWi3STs3Z9hx88twGtUT20v 9FGdJnY0ECDovWvoo2hFhxcF5FphDL/f/HmL5kVUdQ8rJ20j6h9hd5eOzoNPtXBknzXx 5fIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwHd9EWHxdfUHMt9pFLqpRDMFlWtH5tWzkgTlseX3GvYRvSOHIh /fOptVevyWedQFBo X-Received: by 10.223.148.129 with SMTP id 1mr43375256wrr.28.1499323759817; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 23:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p4FDB377F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.219.55.127]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t204sm18127072wme.2.2017.07.05.23.49.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jul 2017 23:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 32 bit additional slowness To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <10e77bde-28b0-bfba-f595-69dbcdc04cfe@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 06:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 On 05/07/2017 23:06, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Just noted on my W7-64bit after 2.8.1 and MS Tuesday patches.. > > on relative small binaries for both architecture > > $ ls -su gpa.exe > 4.0M gpa.exe > > > $ uname -svr > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW 2.8.1(0.312/5/3) 2017-07-03 14:06 > > $ time nm -l gpa.exe > ... > real 4m10.636s > user 4m8.524s > sys 0m0.233s > > > $ uname -svr > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 2.8.1(0.312/5/3) 2017-07-03 14:11 > > $ time nm -l gpa.exe > ... > real 0m0.466s > user 0m0.358s > sys 0m0.093s > > > anyone seeing the same ? > > Marco with binary of latest test binutils-2.28.90 I see a dramatic improvement on i686 time ./nm -l /tmp/gpa.exe .. real 0m1.308s user 0m0.904s sys 0m0.062s -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple