From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26856 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2014 22:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 22:05:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Received: from smtpback.ht-systems.ru (HELO smtpback.ht-systems.ru) (78.110.50.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:05:21 +0000 Received: from [91.79.67.207] (helo=darkdragon.lan) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XCbzm-0006j9-Qz for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:05:14 +0400 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (HELO daemon2) by daemon2 (Office Mail Server 0.8.12 build 08053101) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:03:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:05:00 -0000 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <1262792977.20140731020332@yandex.ru> To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration? In-Reply-To: <20140730150100.GO25860@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20140730134716.GM25860@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140730150100.GO25860@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > Do you mean > builtin accounts; "NT AUTHORITY+SYSTEM", "BUILTIN+Administrators", ... > primary domain "corinna", "cgf", ... > other domain: "DOMAIN1+walter", "DOMAIN2+mathilda" That sounds about right to me. >> So it'd be >> better to simply flag which groups to prefix, I'd think ("local", "primary", >> "other") and specify this like symbolic modes in chmod, perhaps? >> >> > Bonus question: >> > >> > 4. Should Cygwin downcase all usernames when generating the Cygwin >> > username, so, if your Windows username is 'Ralph', your Cygwin >> > username will be 'ralph'? >> >> I'd be in favor of this since I've already had two users that wouldn't see >> their home directories until I figured out that they'd have their names >> capitalized in AD... as long as Windows is unable to distinguish users >> based on the case there shouldn't be a problem. I've got my lesson learned since I've tried to set up authorization server for a wide range of devices at once. Since then, I _always_ make user names lowercase. And pure alphabetic. So, I wouldn't notice a difference. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 31.07.2014, <02:01> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple